App-lsplusplus 0.60
- Released by
- WOLDRICH
- Version
- Release Date
- 2019-03-17
- Kwalitee
- 121.88
- Core Kwalitee
- 78.12
- LINKS
App-lsplusplus 0.60
Kwalitee Issues
- has_readme
-
Add a README to the distribution. It should contain a quick description of your module and how to install it.
- has_changelog
-
Add a Changelog (best named 'Changes') to the distribution. It should list at least major changes implemented in newer versions.
- has_tests
-
Add tests!
- has_human_readable_license
-
Add a section called "LICENSE" to the documentation, or add a file named LICENSE to the distribution.
- has_license_in_source_file
-
Add =head1 LICENSE and the text of the license to the main module in your code.
- has_abstract_in_pod
-
Provide a short description in the NAME section of the pod (after the module name followed by a hyphen) at least for the main module of this distribution.
- main_module_version_matches_dist_version
-
Make sure that the main module name and version are the same of the distribution.
- meta_yml_declares_perl_version
-
If you are using Build.PL define the {requires}{perl} = VERSION field. If you are using MakeMaker (Makefile.PL) you should upgrade ExtUtils::MakeMaker to 6.48 and use MIN_PERL_VERSION parameter. Perl::MinimumVersion can help you determine which version of Perl your module needs.
- has_tests_in_t_dir
-
Add tests or move tests.pl to the t/ directory!
- proper_libs
-
Move your *.pm files in a directory named 'lib'. The directory structure should look like 'lib/Your/Module.pm' for a module named 'Your::Module'. If you need to provide additional files, e.g. for testing, that should not be considered for Kwalitee, then you should look at the 'provides' map in META.yml to limit the files scanned; or use the 'no_index' map to exclude parts of the distribution.
Error: ./ls++
- no_missing_files_in_provides
-
Use authoring tool like Dist::Zilla, Milla, and Minilla to generate correct provides.
Error: ./ls++
- has_known_license_in_source_file
-
Add =head1 LICENSE and/or the proper text of the well-known license to the main module in your code.
- has_separate_license_file
-
This is not a critical issue. Currently mainly informative for the CPANTS authors. It might be removed later.
Modules
| Name | Abstract | Version | View |
|---|---|---|---|
| App::lsplusplus | metacpan |